1963 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 436 more horse power than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. (36 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Autobianchi Bianchina | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Autobianchi | Ford |
Model | Bianchina | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 499 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 36 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1840 mm | 2580 mm |