1963 Autobianchi Bianchina vs. 2009 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2009 Nissan Pixo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina would be higher. At 996 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Pixo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. (19 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina.
Because 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Autobianchi Bianchina | 2009 Nissan Pixo | |
| Make | Autobianchi | Nissan |
| Model | Bianchina | Pixo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 479 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 19 HP | 68 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 95 km/hour | 155 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 2990 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1850 mm | 2360 mm |
