1963 BMW 1800 vs. 1965 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1965 Zastava 1500 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,766 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 BMW 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 1800 (90 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1965 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 1800 should accelerate faster than 1965 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 1800 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1965 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 1800 (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 1800 | 1965 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 1800 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1766 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 144 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |