1963 BMW 1800 vs. 1968 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1968 Cadillac Brougham is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 7,734 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac Brougham (229 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac Brougham should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1080 kg more than 1963 BMW 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 1800 | 1968 Cadillac Brougham | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 1800 | Brougham |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 7734 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 79 L |
