1963 BMW 1800 vs. 1995 Buick Regal
To start off, 1995 Buick Regal is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 2,842 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Buick Regal weights approximately 240 kg more than 1963 BMW 1800.
Because 1963 BMW 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 1800 | 1995 Buick Regal | |
| Make | BMW | Buick |
| Model | 1800 | Regal |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 2842 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1340 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |
