1963 BMW 1800 vs. 1996 Honda Civic
To start off, 1996 Honda Civic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 1,766 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 BMW 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda Civic (104 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800.
Because 1963 BMW 1800 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 1800. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Honda Civic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 1800 (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Honda Civic. (140 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Honda Civic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 1800 | 1996 Honda Civic | |
| Make | BMW | Honda |
| Model | 1800 | Civic |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 1590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
