1963 BMW 1800 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (211 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 647 kg more than 1963 BMW 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 1800. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 1800 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 1800 | Dakota |
Year Released | 1963 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1766 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 319 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1747 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 76 L |