1963 BMW 1800 vs. 2009 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2009 Holden Commodore is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 1800. (144 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 1800 | 2009 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 1800 | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
