1963 BMW 1800 vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 1800. (144 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 1800 | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
| Make | BMW | Holden |
| Model | 1800 | Colorado |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1766 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 161 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 360 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
