1963 BMW 1800 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 1800 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (572 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 482 more horse power than 1963 BMW 1800. (90 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 1800.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (754 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 610 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 1800. (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 1800 | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | 1800 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1766 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 754 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 9.1 |
Top Speed | 156 km/hour | 290 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 72 L |