1963 BMW 502 vs. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac Eldorado should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 625 kg more than 1963 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 1965 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | BMW | Cadillac |
Model | 502 | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 2115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |