1963 BMW 502 vs. 1965 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 1965 Citroen 2CV is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1965 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1965 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 930 kg more than 1965 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 Citroen 2CV, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 502 | 1965 Citroen 2CV | |
| Make | BMW | Citroen |
| Model | 502 | 2CV |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 425 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 19 L |
