1963 BMW 502 vs. 1976 Citroen CX
To start off, 1976 Citroen CX is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1976 Citroen CX. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1976 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 80 kg more than 1976 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Citroen CX. (186 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 1976 Citroen CX | |
Make | BMW | Citroen |
Model | 502 | CX |
Year Released | 1963 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2347 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 186 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 85.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 68 L |