1963 BMW 502 vs. 1996 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 130 kg more than 1963 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 1996 Eagle Vision | |
Make | BMW | Eagle |
Model | 502 | Vision |
Year Released | 1963 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |