1963 BMW 502 vs. 1997 Rover 414i

To start off, 1997 Rover 414i is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.

Compare all specifications: