1963 BMW 502 vs. 2000 TVR Chimaera
To start off, 2000 TVR Chimaera is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,546 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 TVR Chimaera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 TVR Chimaera (282 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 TVR Chimaera should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 430 kg more than 2000 TVR Chimaera.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 TVR Chimaera (306 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2000 TVR Chimaera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2000 TVR Chimaera | |
Make | BMW | TVR |
Model | 502 | Chimaera |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 4546 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 306 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 57 L |