1963 BMW 502 vs. 2001 Volkswagen Lupo
To start off, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. (129 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 515 kg more than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Volkswagen Lupo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo. (152 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volkswagen Lupo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2001 Volkswagen Lupo | |
Make | BMW | Volkswagen |
Model | 502 | Lupo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 86.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 34 L |