1963 BMW 502 vs. 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier

To start off, 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier. (121 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 275 kg more than 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier. (176 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier.

Compare all specifications:

1963 BMW 502 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier
Make BMW Chevrolet
Model 502 Cavalier
Year Released 1963 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3168 cc 2190 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 158 HP 121 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 240 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 3600 RPM 3600 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.1 mm 89 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1215 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4600 mm
Vehicle Width 1790 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2840 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 57 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]