1963 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Daewoo Lacetti
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Lacetti is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2005 Daewoo Lacetti. (94 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2005 Daewoo Lacetti. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 BMW 502 weights approximately 320 kg more than 2005 Daewoo Lacetti. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Lacetti, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Daewoo Lacetti. (130 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Daewoo Lacetti.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2005 Daewoo Lacetti | |
Make | BMW | Daewoo |
Model | 502 | Lacetti |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 130 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 77.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 73.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |