1963 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 20 kg more than 1963 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander. (213 Nm). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | BMW | Mitsubishi |
Model | 502 | Outlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.1 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |