1963 BMW 502 vs. 2005 Renault Megane
To start off, 2005 Renault Megane is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Renault Megane. (108 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Megane weights approximately 280 kg more than 1963 BMW 502.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Megane. (105 Nm). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2005 Renault Megane | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 502 | Megane |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 105 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1770 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 60 L |