1963 BMW 502 vs. 2005 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2005 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (217 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 410 kg more than 1963 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 SsangYong Rexton (307 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2005 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 BMW 502 | 2005 SsangYong Rexton | |
| Make | BMW | SsangYong |
| Model | 502 | Rexton |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2874 cc |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 217 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 240 Nm | 307 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1900 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |
