1963 BMW 502 vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2007 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2007 Holden Epica.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2007 Holden Epica | |
Make | BMW | Holden |
Model | 502 | Epica |
Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 240 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2700 mm |