1963 BMW 502 vs. 2011 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 4,367 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (311 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1963 BMW 502. (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 502.
Because 2011 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Land Rover Range Rover (700 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 460 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 502. (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 502.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2011 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | BMW | Land Rover |
Model | 502 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 4367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 700 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4973 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2891 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 104 L |