1963 BMW 502 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,168 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 BMW 502 (158 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (132 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 BMW 502 should accelerate faster than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1963 BMW 502 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 502. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 BMW 502 (240 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1963 BMW 502 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 502 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 502 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3168 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |