1963 BMW 700 vs. 1967 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1967 Zastava 1500 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,295 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 314 kg more than 1963 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Zastava 1500 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 1967 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | BMW | Zastava |
Model | 700 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 52 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2430 mm |