1963 BMW 700 vs. 1999 Renault Zo
To start off, 1999 Renault Zo is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Zo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Zo (74 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Zo should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Zo weights approximately 909 kg more than 1963 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Renault Zo (260 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm). This means 1999 Renault Zo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 1999 Renault Zo | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 700 | Zo |
Year Released | 1963 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1575 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 83 L |