1963 BMW 700 vs. 2000 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2000 Dodge Neon is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700.
Because 1963 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Dodge Neon (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2000 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 2000 Dodge Neon | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 700 | Neon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 1795 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 152 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2650 mm |