1963 BMW 700 vs. 2000 Honda J-VX
To start off, 2000 Honda J-VX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 999 cc, 2000 Honda J-VX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Honda J-VX (104 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Honda J-VX weights approximately 799 kg more than 1963 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Honda J-VX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Honda J-VX (144 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm). This means 2000 Honda J-VX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 2000 Honda J-VX | |
Make | BMW | Honda |
Model | 700 | J-VX |
Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 999 cc |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 144 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1465 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2720 mm |