1963 BMW 700 vs. 2005 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2005 Dodge Neon is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Neon (230 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Neon weights approximately 649 kg more than 1963 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Neon (339 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 2005 Dodge Neon | |
Make | BMW | Dodge |
Model | 700 | Neon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 2425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 230 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 339 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1315 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 47 L |