1963 BMW 700 vs. 2005 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2005 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700.
Because 1963 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 2005 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 700 | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2490 mm |