1963 BMW 700 vs. 2005 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2005 Ford Taurus is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 BMW 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 BMW 700 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Taurus (153 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 BMW 700. (38 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1963 BMW 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Taurus weights approximately 609 kg more than 1963 BMW 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 BMW 700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 BMW 700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Taurus (251 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 BMW 700. (52 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Taurus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 BMW 700.
Compare all specifications:
1963 BMW 700 | 2005 Ford Taurus | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 700 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 697 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 38 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 52 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 78 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 666 kg | 1275 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |