1963 Bristol 408 vs. 1990 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1990 Ford Ranger is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1990 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 1990 Ford Ranger.
Because 1990 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Bristol 408. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Bristol 408 | 1990 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 408 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5129 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4690 mm |