1963 Bristol 408 vs. 1992 Chrysler Le Baron
To start off, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1963 Bristol 408 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Bristol 408. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Bristol 408 | 1992 Chrysler Le Baron | |
Make | Bristol | Chrysler |
Model | 408 | Le Baron |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5129 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2560 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 100 L |