1963 Bristol 408 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2005 Ford E-250 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Bristol 408. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1963 Bristol 408. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 719 kg more than 1963 Bristol 408. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Bristol 408 (463 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 1963 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Bristol 408 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
| Make | Bristol | Ford |
| Model | 408 | E-250 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5129 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 132 L |
