1963 Bristol 408 vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econoline. (197 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econoline weights approximately 740 kg more than 1963 Bristol 408.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Bristol 408 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 1963 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Bristol 408 | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | 408 | Econoline |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5129 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 463 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2325 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3510 mm |