1963 Bristol 408 vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. At 5,129 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Bristol 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1963 Bristol 408. (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1963 Bristol 408. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 481 kg more than 1963 Bristol 408. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Bristol 408. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Bristol 408 (463 Nm) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 1963 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Bristol 408 | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | 408 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5129 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 434 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 98.6 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.1 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1585 kg | 2066 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2730 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 87 L |
