1963 Bristol 408 vs. 2008 Smart Ultimate 112
To start off, 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Bristol 408. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Bristol 408 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1963 Bristol 408 (215 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Bristol 408 should accelerate faster than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Bristol 408 (463 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1963 Bristol 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Smart Ultimate 112.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Bristol 408 | 2008 Smart Ultimate 112 | |
| Make | Bristol | Smart |
| Model | 408 | Ultimate 112 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 110 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 463 Nm | 151 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1570 mm |
