1963 Buick Riviera vs. 1992 Ford Taurus

To start off, 1992 Ford Taurus is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Buick Riviera. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Buick Riviera would be higher. At 6,571 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Buick Riviera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Buick Riviera (321 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1992 Ford Taurus. (220 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Buick Riviera should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Taurus.

Because 1963 Buick Riviera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Buick Riviera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Buick Riviera (603 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Taurus. (271 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1963 Buick Riviera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Taurus. 1963 Buick Riviera has automatic transmission and 1992 Ford Taurus has manual transmission. 1992 Ford Taurus will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1963 Buick Riviera will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 Buick Riviera 1992 Ford Taurus
Make Buick Ford
Model Riviera Taurus
Year Released 1963 1992
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6571 cc 2986 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 321 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 603 Nm 271 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 106.2 mm 89.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.5 mm 80 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.6:1 9.8:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5290 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1950 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]