1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1955 Fiat 1400
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Fiat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Fiat 1400 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 867 kg more than 1955 Fiat 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1955 Fiat 1400 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | 1400 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6388 cc | 1901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 38 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1188 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2660 mm |