1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1580 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | 62 | 256 F1 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 292 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 159 L |