1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1960 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1960 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1960 Ford Zodiac. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 899 kg more than 1960 Ford Zodiac. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1960 Ford Zodiac | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Zodiac |
Year Released | 1963 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 2552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 79.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 1191 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 50 L |