1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DKW Munga would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1024 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1961 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Cadillac | DKW |
| Model | 62 | Munga |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1961 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 43 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 31 L |
