1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1962 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 1963 Cadillac 62 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 7,043 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 188 kg more than 1963 Cadillac 62.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1962 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Cadillac | Lincoln |
Model | 62 | Continental |
Year Released | 1963 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 7043 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 300 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 2328 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 90 L |