1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1966 Honda S600
To start off, 1966 Honda S600 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 141 more horse power than 1966 Honda S600. (56 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1966 Honda S600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1966 Honda S600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1966 Honda S600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | S600 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 606 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 54.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 98.4 mm | 65 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 705 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3350 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1410 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 35 L |
