1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1967 Fiat 500
To start off, 1967 Fiat 500 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1967 Fiat 500. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1967 Fiat 500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1610 kg more than 1967 Fiat 500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1967 Fiat 500 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | 500 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 1850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 22 L |