1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1969 MG 1100
To start off, 1969 MG 1100 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1969 MG 1100. (70 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1969 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1250 kg more than 1969 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Cadillac 62 | 1969 MG 1100 | |
Make | Cadillac | MG |
Model | 62 | 1100 |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2380 mm |