1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1970 Volkswagen 1600
To start off, 1970 Volkswagen 1600 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1130 kg more than 1970 Volkswagen 1600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1970 Volkswagen 1600 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 1582 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 52 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2140 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2340 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 40 L |
