1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1970 Zastava 850 K
To start off, 1970 Zastava 850 K is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1970 Zastava 850 K. (35 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1970 Zastava 850 K. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1235 kg more than 1970 Zastava 850 K. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1970 Zastava 850 K | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | 62 | 850 K |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1970 |
| Engine Size | 6390 cc | 848 cc |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2090 kg | 855 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 3740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2010 mm |
