1963 Cadillac 62 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Cadillac 62 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | 62 | Biscayne |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6388 cc | 4097 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 110 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2055 kg | 1807 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5670 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3090 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 79 L | 87 L |
